Alice essays

Alice essays Comparing to other books, this one is much easier to read but difficult to understand. Instead of understanding this book, I fall in to a weird experience. It seemed so unrealistic. I found that I don't need to search for the meaning of it and just enjoy the feeling. (Maybe because I am not smart enough) It is so interesting that there are so many interpretations and everybody has different interpretation of the story. Some people say that falling in to the rabbit hole is symbolizing the process of birth and some say that it is an entrance to the wonderland. I think that Luis Carrolle wanted reader to feel all those things. Human is a very funny animal, never console without putting a meaning for @music, story, painting. maybe the painter put the paint on canvas with no @meaning @but the person who appreciate it, will put the deep meaning on it. A musician chooses the songs name randomly from dictionary and listener imagine the thing while listening to the music. I think it is not good to put the exact meaning with words for art or story because if it can be explained by words, there is no meaning to express it that way. The reason why the work is expressed the way it is, is because that's the best way to express it. There is need to be explained but feel. I don't like critics because they are just trying to define something that cannot be defined. Some say that it is not interesting without interpreting each scene to find what is symbolizing what. However if we put meaning for each clearly, that's boring and there is no magic in this story anymore. It is said that this story is a satire of political circle, satire of society, or process of growing of a female. I don't wanna put one particular opinion but I think I am reading this with all these opinions somewhere in my head. If I haven't heard any opinion before read this may be I could enjoy it more. My friend told me that Lewis Carroll was doing drug durin...

Americans with Disabilities Act

Americans with Disabilities Act Americans with Disabilities Act: 29th Anniversary 29 years ago today, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), was passed, which marked a major milestone in protecting the rights of those with disabilities. It is regarded as one of the most robust pieces of civil rights legislation.What Did the ADA Establish? The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in areas such as employment, communications and transportation, as well as access to government program and services.The ADA is broken into five separate sections, known as titles of protection. Let’s take a closer look at each one.Title I – Employment  Title I of the ADA entitles individuals with disabilities to the same employment opportunities and benefits as those without disabilitiesAn employer must provide reasonable accommodations to those applicants with disabilities who are otherwise qualified.In addition, an individual cannot be refused employment for a position that they are qualified to do.  Title II â⠂¬â€œ Public Services: State and Local Government  Title II of the ADA requires state and local agencies to ensure that their services, activities, policies, procedures, and programs offered are accessible to individuals with disabilities.  Title III – Public Accommodations and Services Operated by Private Entities  Title III focuses on public places, such as restaurants, movie theaters, and sports stadiums. It defines and requires the minimum standards necessary for any new construction.Title III states that existing public places remove barriers wherever necessary, making â€Å"reasonable accommodations† for customers with hearing, vision, and speech disabilities, barring undue hardship to the owner.  Title IV – Telecommunications  Title IV requires that telephone and Internet companies create services (such as closed captioning of federally funded public service announcements on TVs) that enable any individuals with speech or hearing impairments to communicate.  Title V – Miscellaneous Provisions  The fifth and final title of the ADA includes many other provisions in regards to the ADA as a whole, its relationship to state laws, insurance benefits, retaliation, and more. It also includes a list of what conditions are not considered to be a disability for purposes of this Act.Celebrating the ADA Anniversary As we celebrate the ADA’s 29th anniversary on July 26th, it is important for us to acknowledge the importance of equity among those with and without disabilities.To learn more about the ADA and the anniversary, The ADA National Network offers various resources, including videos and photos from past celebrations.We Can HelpIf you are disabled and unable to work, call  Disability Attorneys of Michigan  for a free confidential consultation. We’ll let you know if we can help you get a monthly check and help you determine if any money or assets you receive could impact your eligibility for disability benefits.Disability Attorneys of Michigan  works hard every day helping the disabled of Michigan seek the  Social Security Disability Benefits  they need. If you are unable to work due to a physical, mental, or cognitive impairment, call  Disability Attorneys of Michigan  now for a free consultation at  800-701- 5524.Let Michigan’s experienced Social Security Disability law firm help you get the benefits you deserve. Americans with Disabilities Act, disability attorney, disability lawyer, Michigan disability lawyer

Keegan v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd Essay

Keegan v Newcastle United Football Co Ltd - Essay Example 2million in addition to interest which will be assessed if the parties do not agree. In the United Kingdom, Constructive dismissal is covered under the Employment Rights Act 1996 (Prichard, 2005, p. 15) Facts Mr Keegan was appointed the Manager of the Club (for the second time) under a written Contract signed and dated 16 January 2008. The then Chairman of the Club, Chris Mort, had approached him about the position a few days earlier, and asked him to meet Mike Ashley (the owner) before deciding whether to take up the appointment. Therefore, a meeting was arranged to take place on 16 January 2008 in London; in attendance were Mr Keegan, Mike Ashley, Mr Mort and Tony Jimenez. After lengthy negotiations and discussions, the Contract was signed between Mr Keegan and the Newcastle United Football Club, and Mr Keegan was appointed the Manager of the Club at an initial salary of ?3million per annum. The primary case for Mr Keegan is under the contract’s terms. Before the signing of the contract, they had agreed that he was to have the final say, and this is the basis on which he signed the contract on. Also, he asserts that at this meeting, Messrs Ashley, Jimenez, and Mort has expressly assured him that he would have the final say. However, the Newcastle Club argues that nothing was expressly said at the meeting regarding whether Mr Keegan will have the final say. In the case, the Club argues that Mr Keegan was told that there was a possibility that Dennis Wise (who was the then Manager of Leeds), would be appointed to this post. As such, the Club argue that under this structure, Tony Jimenez and the Director of Football would be responsible for recruitment of players and they would have the final say, not Mr Keegan. There are several events that culminated to the resignation of Mr Keegan on 4 September 2008. On 30 August 2008, almost at the end of the transfer window Mr Keegan was telephoned by Mr Wise and was told that he had a great player for the Club to s ign, namely Ignacio Gonzalez, and therefore he should look him up. Mr Keegan tried to do a background search about the player and could not even locate him on the internet and so was not satisfied that he will make a good player. Notwithstanding the fact that Mr Keegan had made it clear to Mr Wise, Mr Jimenez and to Mr Ashley that he strongly objected to the signing of Mr Gonzalez, the Club went ahead with the deal and the transfer was concluded on 31 August 2008. The Club defended its move as being motivated by commercial interests of the Club. The Club described these commercial interests as: the signing of the player on loan would be seen as a â€Å"favour† to two South American agents who were influential and would look Club favourably in the future. Whereas it is clear that Mr Keegan had concerns concerning the nature of this deal, his primary objection to it was that it breached the term of his contract by which he, as the Manager, would have the final say. Mr Keegan st ated that despite several attempts by both sides to find a way forward, there seemed to be no headway and he thus concluded that he had no option but to leave the Club. Legally, Mr Keegan argued, the Club had breached